Subject	Re:???
Posted by	Angry Z on September 30, 2004 at 11:37 AM
	This message has been viewed 84 times.
In Reply To	??? posted by Guapo on September 30, 2004 at 10:54 AM
Message	[ http://members.accesstoledo.com/mike_cain/na_cylinder_head.htm ] Read down to the section about - "Introduction and why I performed this procedure:" I had the actual bulletin as a jpg on my PC at one point but i can't seem to find it right now. If someone could actually find the bulletin on the web, and check the VIN numbers of the cars affected, it would be interesting to see if many of the people who posted in this thread have VIN numbers which are listed in the TSB. But of course, even if they did have affected cars, it's good to know that the defect itself must not be that serious, since many engines can last even up to 193K miles without the problem becoming apparent. Just my thought. "What you are about to hear is the truth. And by true, i mean false. It's all lies. But, they're entertaining lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer, is no." - Leonard Nimoy
Follow Ups	Is This true about all 90Z's? - Bouncer068 08:47:15 09/30/04 My NA has 96k and i have had no problems with the heads (n/m) - Atl300zxTT 08:50:31 09/30/04 105K on my '90 TT - no problems of that type. (n/m) - Dave N 08:50:47 09/30/04 driver error, loose nuts, the list goes on (n/m) - JDMz32smity 08:57:38 09/30/04 You must be thinking of Tony, aka BigTDogg, aka loose nutz - Dave N 09:29:42 09/30/04 My 2+2 has 187k miles and i've got no signs of problems (n/m) - jkperformance 09:05:04 09/30/04 The early production 90 Zs had a problem with soft valve - Jonezy 09:05:27 09/30/04 True, but most if not all of these Z's are already fixed or - FlawleZ 09:31:37 09/30/04 193k and running strong... - fantomZ(OH) 09:06:57 09/30/04 oh yeah, and mine was actually produced in 89 (n/m) - fantomZ(OH) 09:12:26 09/30/04 Most of the 90's have 89 production dates. (n/m) - FlawleZ 09:30:13 09/30/04 mine was produced in May of 90 and I've had no problems. (n/m) - doug8867 10:30:28 09/30/04 2nd: Production date 7/89, serial #786 for mine. (n/m) - Dave N 09:30:18 09/30/04 pfft, February 89, S/N 000028 here :-) (n/m) - ZEngineer (TT) 10:28:59 09/30/04 But that's for the chassis, you ripped out the motor - Dave N 12:23:47 09/30/04 way to piss on my parade.....jerk :-( (n/m) - ZEngineer (TT) 12:40:42 09/30/04 i had 155k on the first z... no problems (n/m) - halik 09:29:56 09/30/04 I'm told it's true.... and it happened to me - Angry Z 10:45:09 09/30/04 ??? - Guapo 10:54:59 09/30/04 Re:??? - Angry Z 11:37:09 09/30/04 if motors are lasting to 190k I'd hardly call it a problem. (n/m) - Guapo 11:52:52 09/30/04 12/89 build date.. no head problems (n/m) - 90BlkZ18 12:23:10 09/30/04 The TSB is inside the link you provided...more info> - cainmt (Toledo,OH) 17:24:15 09/30/04 Nope...my head is great. (n/m) - Milo (Sport Z Magazine) 12:22:22 09/30/04 I think a more correct statement would be - KaZ (VaBch) 14:23:47 09/30/04 90 TT ran 256,000 miles before pass. side headgasket leak (n/m) - Fly-Surf 14:46:01 09/30/04 Re: Is This true about all 90Z's? - Bouncer068 17:20:02 09/30/04 read my post above, good luck. (n/m) - cainmt (Toledo,OH) 17:26:11 09/30/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.